Best Cities for Recreation | Worst Cities for Recreation | ||||
1 | Cincinnati, OH | 91 | Anaheim, CA | ||
2 | Omaha, NE | 92 | Garland, TX | ||
3 | Scottsdale, AZ | 93 | Fremont, CA | ||
4 | Tampa, FL | 94 | North Las Vegas, NV | ||
5 | Boise City, ID | 95 | Chula Vista, CA | ||
6 | Orlando, FL | 96 | Hialeah, FL | ||
7 | Minneapolis, MN | 97 | Laredo, TX | ||
8 | St. Louis, MO | 98 | Irving, TX | ||
9 | Reno, NV | 99 | Newark, NJ | ||
10 | Denver, CO | 100 | Jersey City, NJ |
Key StatsÂ
- Madison, Wis., has 14 times as many park playgrounds per 100,000 residents as Hialeah, Fla.
- The percentage of the population with walkable park access is 4 times higher in San Francisco than in Charlotte, N.C.
- Washington spends 100 times more on parks per capita than Hialeah, Fla.
- Seattle has 46 times as many coffee shops per 100,000 residents as Laredo, Texas.
- The number of bike rental facilities per 100,000 residents is 28 times higher in San Francisco than in Tulsa, Okla.
For the full report and to see where your city ranks, please visit:
http://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-cities-for-recreation/5144/